Washington, DC: U. The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota. Hanson, R.
Related legal case
The effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1 , — Lowden, K. MacKenzie, D. New York: Cambridge University Press. Olver, M. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24 , — Schmucker, M.
The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11 4 , High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29 15 , — Reductions in risk based on time offense free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender.
- barack h obama birth certificate!
- linux find local ip address.
- Reformers: sex offender mandate would hurt Illinois?
- sex offenders in wadena county minnesota.
- The Limits of Free Speech : Illinois Law Review.
- the mental health act 2007 and dangerous sex offenders.
- Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region.
Duwe, G. Criminology, 46 2 , — Lasher, M. The impact of community notification on sex offender reintegration: A quantitative review of the research literature.
Letourneau, E. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21 4 , — Does a Watched Pot Boil?enter
Illinois Statutes Chapter Corrections § 5/ | FindLaw
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14 , Retrieved from: Zevitz, R. Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19 2 , — Zgoba, K. State Legislation Monitoring Report. Socia, K.
What crimes require registration as a sex offender?
The efficacy of county-level sex offender residence restrictions in New York. Effectiveness of residence restrictions in preventing sex offense recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 58 , Zandbergen, P.
Residential proximity to schools and daycares: An empirical analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37 5 , — Analyzing the impact of statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders.
Sex offender registries in the United States
Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20 1 , 21— Chajewski, M. An evaluation of sex offender residence restrictions functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20 1 , 44— Levenson, J. Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21 2 , — The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1, feet from danger or one step from absurd?
Fourth, because of the stigma of being a sex offender, as recognized by the Minnis Court, prosecutors must continue to engage in thorough investigations of sex crimes cases, and they must be particularly careful when deciding whether to charge, or to seek indictments of, juveniles and adults for sex crimes.
Finally, the First Amendment free speech rights of sex offenders in the context of the Internet and the criminal justice system, as reviewed by the Illinois Supreme Court, may present significant new legal and policy issues in years to come. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not of any entity or committee.
Justice Charles Freeman authored the unanimous Opinion. On May 19, , the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case at Benedictine University in Lisle, Illinois, before an audience of approximately high school students and members of the general public, including this author. The Illinois Court was confronted with an especially difficult factual case since Minnis claimed that the underlying conviction was based on his consensual sex between the then year old juvenile defendant and the year old female. Minnis , IL , at n. The constitutional challenge to the Internet disclosure requirement involved both adult and juvenile offenders, undoubtedly because Minnis became an adult during these proceedings.
However, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois and the Electronic Frontier Foundation submitted amicus curiae briefs in support of the defendant, which also invoked the free speech guaranty of the Illinois Constitution. The Court did not address this state issue. See People v.
The Limits of Free Speech
Di Guida, Ill. Cornelius, Ill. Hicks, U. Liberties Union, U. Interestingly, in the post-Minnis oral argument discussion, numerous high-school students asked questions to the lawyers that suggested a potential dislike for government regulation of the Internet, especially their Facebook accounts.